Future of Asymmetric DSL
As customer demand for triple-play services -
voice, data, and video - increases
, so does the competition between carriers/DSL
service providers and cable operators. While the later are already offering
HDTV, VoD, VoIP and other high-speed services, DSL providers cannot compete with
the high data rates requirements as existing xDSL technology fail to achieve
them. The need for some high speed fiber-like broadband capability is
in place, and the sooner - the better.
One solution
is indeed to extend fiber-to-the-home, every home. But this has
economical implications, since fiber is has quite a high cost. Creating
the infrastructure also take time, contradicting our "the sooner - the
better" assumption. The solution is preferably to be a DSL solution, using existing
POTS , being economically profitable for
carriers, and offer great
deal of bandwidth for consumers
to enjoy rich and smooth contents off the net.
VDSL2
Very-high-bit-rate Digital
Subscriber Line 2 (VDSL2) has been in developement by several
chip manufacturers for quite some time, and made another important step with the
publication of ITU-T Recommendation G.993.2 on May 2005.
VDSL2 will take notes from the standardization
process of ADSL. Bodies such as the
DSLforum evaluated and tested the performance of ADSL in several conditions, to
determine the best modulation techniques, deploying schemes, and more factors
which influenced and shaped the final standard of ADSL. Therefore it is no
surprise to see that VDSL2 chose DMT
over CAP as was did
ADSL. It also Support a wide range of test parameters, adopted from
ADSL2.
Furthermore, observing the many challenges (along with their
solutions) associated with deploying ADSL on a massive scale, including the lack
of detailed standardization and network management tools, spectrum management
issues, specifications for filters, and more, might allow mass deployment of
VDSL2 much earlier than happened with ADSL.
VDSL2 support both asymmetric and symmetric transmission, with an aggregate data rates up to 200Mbps on twisted pairs - 100Mbps for downstream and 100Mbps for upstream . Its allocated spectrum is increased from 12khz as in the case of its predecessor the VDSL, up to 30khz.

Figure 1. Spectrum allocation in VDSL2 is
increased to 30khz
Interoperability
with existing products employing VDSL, ADSL, ADSL2+ is another benefit
for carriers who want to invest in VDSL2, as it makes deploying of the new VDSL2
easier, and also helps migrate costumers from the old technology to the new
one. In addition, VDSL2 support configuration of both ATM and
IP over standard cooper lines, unlike ADSL which is always ATM
based.
Furthermore,
VDSL2 is supported by g994.1, the handshake protocol
for DSL
equipment.
Among the many benefits of VDSL2 perhaps
the most interesting feature is the support of a wide
range of deployment scenarios, which is unique to VDSL2. Transceiver and power
specifications have been defined to deal with interference that are
likely to occur in the types of environments most likely to house VDSL2
equipment, such as central offices, wiring cabinets in neighborhoods or office
parks, or within buildings. A scenario for longer reach has also been
examined.
Other benefits include:
ADSL3
???
It is very unlikely to see any ADSL3 standardization
any time soon, as there is no technology planning from the side of manufacturers,
and no signs of any standard organization. the ITU is still busy
finalizing ADSL2, working out all the problems still need attention. It
seems that VDSL2 will battle it out with ADSL2 to proclaim its place in the
future, and if everything goes as planned it will become the dominant technology
due to its very high data rate. Actually, there are many manufacturers
willing to bet on it, and have already began developing chips for the
technology.
For
those do
not want to give up on ADSL so quickly, there are plans for a lighter
version of VDSL2, which offers 20-25Mbps of downstream (rather then 10-17
as in ADSL2+), and can be thought of as unofficial ADSL3, although standards
organizations would really prefer to leave the name VDSL2.
| Take a quiz |